Assume, you one of the member of a real group discussion. Take the initiative to participate and contribute your thoughts. Express your positive attitude towards providing the solution. Nov 15, Some questions many tend to ask is; 1 Should the two be mixed?
Many times I read that religion and politics should be kept separate. They should not be mixed. Here in India it is a common feeling of the educated gentry. Usually such people are afraid that if politicians subscribe to a particular religion, they will oppress followers of other religions.
There have been examples of such oppression and atrocities in the past where a ruling party crushed or ostracized members of a religion not followed by them.
By Satyanarayana Dasa Many times I read that religion and politics should be kept separate. There are also some states that are religious and do not favor citizens practicing other religions. This is understood to be the chief cause of fear in the minds of people who support keeping religion and politics separate.
Is it an absolute principle? I think not so. The purpose of politics is to do welfare to people. Every politician who contests elections promises to do welfare, whatever it may be. It is on the basis of such a promise that politicians are elected.
The purpose of religion, called dharma ethics, morality, religious dutyis not different from that of politics. Politics is called rajaniti, the code of conduct followed by a ruler or ruling class. Rajaniti is always a part of dharma-shastra such as Manu-smriti or Yajnavalkya-smriti.
Dharma-shastra are the books written by sages of India which delineate the duties of citizens according to various classes varnassuch as educators, rulers, etc. No description of dharma-shastra is complete without laying down the principles for the rulers.
Dharma is meant to give ultimate welfare to society and politics is but a part of it. Therefore, traditionally in India, dharma was never separated from politics. The rulers of India, the kings, were followers of dharma.
In their student life they were trained in dharma. We do not find descriptions of atheistic kings in the history of India before it became a republic state. Avataras came as politicians A rare exception is King Vena, but he was rejected by the people.
His story is described in the Bhagavata Purana. Vena proclaimed himself to be God and prohibited worship of any other god or the performance of yajna sacrifice to propitiate any other deity.
He was advised by the sages to revoke this law, and when he refused to accept their advice, the sages chanted mantras that killed him. This shows that an atheistic king or a king who hindered the religious life of people was not acceptable.
Apart from that, Vena was not such a bad king. There were no thieves or robbers in his kingdom. We also read that the two main avataras, Lord Rama and Lord Krishna, who appeared as human beings, belonged to the ruling class and were therefore politicians, although the main purpose of their descent on earth was to establish dharma.
And establishing dharma is not possible without taking charge of the kingdom, which means being involved in politics. The whole battle of Mahabharata was fought to establish Yudhisthira, who was known as Dharma-raja the king of dharmaas the emperor of India.
Politicians are not trained in dharma Thus dharma and politics go hand-in-hand. One of the major reasons that there is so much corruption in politics at present is that politicians are not trained in dharma, especially in rajaniti, or the duties of a politician.
Politics without dharma is bound to breed corruption sooner or later because of human afflictions like selfishness, greed and other impurities. In India some politicians have contested elections from prison, and there are many who have criminal cases against them.
To avoid adharma in politics, there must be some basic requirement of character for a leader of society.
Similarly, without politics it is almost impossible for people to be dharmic. The role of religion is to make one righteous and loving, and politics means caring for people and their welfare. Need of the time A religious person who is righteous and loving will definitely care for the welfare of the whole population and hence become a true politician.
True politicians can only be righteous and loving.Religion Should Not Be Mixed With Politics. Religion and politics Name ENG Professor June 23, Religion and politics should not be vetconnexx.com John , Jesus said "My kingdom is no part of this world." Jesus Christ himself remained neutral in regards to political aspects.
Religion should not be mixed with politics Many people advocate the thought that religion should not be mixed with politics.
But is that a practical thing?
Is it possible to keep religions and politics away from each other? There is no doubt that religion and politics are two most important elements in people’s lives. Every religion teaches honesty, sincerity and good against evil, if politics will not have religion it means it wont have these teachings which will eventually end up in a .
Now when religious gets mixed with the politics as in India we know that religion is a very sensitive issue for a person could become even more vetconnexx.com it is a common thing to find political parties targeting a particular community as part of vote bank politics. creed. the parties instead of using religion should rather focus on values 5/5(1).
In my opinion religion should not be mixed with politics. PM) Religion cannot be kept away from politics because politics and religion both are a part of our society and life so we cannot draw a line between religion and politics.
Religion should not be mixed with politics both are different things like two banks of river they never meet to each other religion is faith but politics is power. Power should not be interfere in faith it .